Case 1601937/2021 · Employment Tribunal
MRS THOMAS AND MRS JONES IN PERSON FOR THE v Richards Caffi Maes Cyf — 2022
- Case reference
- 1601937/2021
- Decision date
- 6 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
MRS THOMAS AND MRS JONES IN PERSON FOR THE
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs A Thomas and Mrs M Jones appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The tribunal held that the claim of unfair dismissal was made out and that the dismissal was by reason of redundancy. It also found that the claims of unlawful deduction from wages and wrongful dismissal were made out and allowed.
The respondent was ordered to pay Mrs A Thomas £7,043.47, made up of redundancy pay £2,405.70, holiday pay £2,216.07, notice pay £1,603.80 and unlawful deduction from wages £817.90. It was ordered to pay Mrs M Jones £6,375.22, made up of redundancy pay £2,004.75, holiday pay £2,216.07, notice pay £1,336.50 and unlawful deduction from wages £817.90. The judgment records that the respondent company was no longer trading and that the figures were awarded gross, so the claimants would need to make appropriate tax declarations.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claim was made out and that the dismissal was by reason of redundancy. No separate monetary figure was set out for this claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | Redundancy payments were included in the awards to both claimants: Mrs A Thomas received £2,405.70 and Mrs M Jones received £2,004.75. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal allowed this claim and awarded £817.90 to each claimant. | Upheld | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal allowed this claim and awarded notice pay to each claimant: Mrs A Thomas £1,603.80 and Mrs M Jones £1,336.50. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,419
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.