Case 1601950/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Kirkwood v Vencer Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1601950/2020
- Decision date
- 27 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Duncan Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Kirkwood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Cardiff CVP hearing on 23 April 2021 before Employment Judge G Duncan, the tribunal dealt with Mr I Kirkwood's claims against Vencer Ltd for unpaid wages and holiday entitlement. The judgment records that the unpaid wages claim was presented out of time, and that claim was dismissed.
The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered Vencer Ltd to pay Mr Kirkwood the gross sum of £1,680 in respect of unpaid holiday pay. The judgment also records that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on the amount awarded for holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim for unpaid wages was presented out of time and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and was ordered to pay £1,680 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,680 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,680
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.