Case 1601952/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. H. West v Sofidel UK Ltd HELD BY: Telephone — 2020
- Case reference
- 1601952/2020
- Decision date
- 22 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. H. West
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a telephone hearing on 21 December 2020, Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan recorded that Mr H. West's age discrimination and disability discrimination claims were dismissed upon being withdrawn. The written judgment states that those withdrawals did not affect the separate unfair dismissal claim.
The unfair dismissal claim was not determined in this judgment. The tribunal noted that it remained contested and would proceed to a final hearing. The record also states that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The tribunal recorded that the age discrimination claim was dismissed upon being withdrawn. It stated that this did not affect the claimant's unfair dismissal claim, which would proceed to a final hearing. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal recorded that the disability discrimination claim was dismissed upon being withdrawn. It stated that this did not affect the claimant's unfair dismissal claim, which would proceed to a final hearing. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.