Case 1601957/2020 · Employment Tribunal

Ms. S Godfrey v Premier Cars Bangor Ltd. — 2021

Case reference: 1601957/2020
Decision date: 5 January 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Ms. S Godfrey

Respondent

Premier Cars Bangor Ltd.

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan recorded that Ms S Godfrey had been unfairly dismissed by Premier Cars Bangor Ltd. The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay redundancy entitlement to the claimant and had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement.

All three claims were therefore successful: unfair dismissal, redundancy pay, and holiday pay. The judgment does not set out any further reasoning in the extracted text, and it does not determine quantum.

The tribunal directed that the remedy to which the claimant was entitled would be determined at a later Remedy Hearing. No monetary award is recorded in this judgment.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	Found under Rule 21 judgment.	Upheld	—	—
Redundancy	Judgment states the respondent failed to pay redundancy entitlement and the claim succeeded; remedy was left for a later Remedy Hearing.	Upheld	—	—
Holiday pay	Judgment states the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and the claim succeeded; remedy was left for a later Remedy Hearing.	Upheld	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.