Case 1601964/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Pietersen v Adult Home Care Limited (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1601964/2021
- Decision date
- 6 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Evans Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Pietersen
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Cardiff Employment Tribunal on 2 June 2023, Employment Judge R Evans heard the claim brought by Mrs M Pietersen against Adult Home Care Limited (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation). The Claimant did not attend; the Respondent was represented by counsel. The judgment records that the case was decided on the papers and oral reasons were given at the hearing.
The tribunal found that the Claimant’s claim under Part II of the Working Time Regulations 1998 was well-founded and succeeded. The Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant £434.40 gross within 14 days of the judgment. The written record states that no written reasons would be provided unless requested in accordance with the note at the end of the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £434 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £434
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.