Case 1601970/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Perkins v 2nd St Deli Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1601970/2019
- Decision date
- 24 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Perkins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Cardiff on 24 January 2020, Employment Judge S Jenkins amended the respondent's name to 2nd Street Deli Ltd and gave judgment in favour of the claimant on two money claims. The written record states that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and that the respondent was ordered to pay gross damages of £480.77.
The tribunal also found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of a further gross sum of £769.20. The record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested, so the extracted text records the outcomes and awards but does not set out further reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment says the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and orders gross damages of £480.77. | Upheld | — | £481 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment says the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and orders a gross sum of £769.20; the text does not state a separate statutory label for the claim. | Upheld | — | £769 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,250
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.