Case 1601979/2020 · Employment Tribunal

Claimant v Carroll v Celtic Hairdressing Ltd — 2021

Case reference: 1601979/2020
Decision date: 22 March 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Howden-Evans Dated

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Respondent

Carroll v Celtic Hairdressing Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The judgment records that the complaints of unilateral change in terms and conditions, unfair furlough, unlawful deductions from wages, and claims in relation to "other payments" were dismissed following a withdrawal by the Claimant. The tribunal did not determine those complaints on their merits in this decision.

The same judgment records that the Claimant's remaining claims of unfair dismissal, direct sex discrimination, sex discrimination (equal pay), and part-time worker detrimental treatment would proceed to hearing on 16, 17, 18 and 19 August 2021. No liability findings or remedy awards were made in this judgment.

Claims and outcomes

4 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	Complaint of unilateral change in terms and conditions. Dismissed following withdrawal by the Claimant.	Dismissed	—	—
Other	Complaint of unfair furlough. Dismissed following withdrawal by the Claimant.	Dismissed	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	Unlawful deductions from wages complaint. Dismissed following withdrawal by the Claimant.	Dismissed	—	—
Other	Claims in relation to 'other payments'. Dismissed following withdrawal by the Claimant.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.