Case 1601980/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Kalinowski v Elidyr Communities Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 1601980/2021
- Decision date
- 20 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharp Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Kalinowski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 28 June 2022, the Tribunal gave Mrs J Kalinowski an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not make representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The reasons do not include any merits findings on the underlying allegations. The hearing listed for 7 to 9 September 2022 was vacated and did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment records that the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued. The underlying GOV.UK listing for the case identifies a Public Interest Disclosure claim, but the reasons note does not restate the substantive claim type. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued. The underlying GOV.UK listing for the case identifies an unfair dismissal claim, but the reasons note does not restate the substantive claim type. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.