Case 1601983/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. J. Thomas v Southern Care Group Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1601983/2019
- Decision date
- 5 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. J. Thomas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Mold on 3 February 2020, Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan found that Southern Care Group Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from Ms J. Thomas’s wages in July and August 2019. The deductions identified were £60.00 net in July, £450 net in August, and non-payment of the last day’s pay calculated at 5 hours x £16.50 = £82.50, with tax and national insurance to be deducted from the latter item.
The tribunal also found that the respondent breached Ms Thomas’s contract in relation to notice of termination and ordered compensation of £594.00, described as one week’s pay and subject to tax/NI. The total sum awarded was £1,186.50, subject to the statutory deductions noted in the judgment. The written record states that reasons were given orally and no written reasons were provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages in July and August 2019, including £60.00 net, £450 net, and non-payment of the last day’s pay at 5 hours x £16.50 = £82.50, subject to tax/NI on the last item. | Upheld | — | £593 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found a breach of contract concerning notice of termination and awarded compensation of £594.00, described as one week’s pay, subject to tax/NI. | Upheld | — | £594 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,187
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.