Case 1601993/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. T. Jones v Konsulter Limited (in compulsory liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1601993/2020
- Decision date
- 18 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. T. Jones
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 liability judgment in which Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan found for Ms. T. Jones on both pleaded heads of claim. The tribunal held that Konsulter Group Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and had breached her contract by not paying expenses that were due.
The judgment did not quantify the award. Instead, it stated that the sum to be awarded to the claimant was to be assessed on submission of written evidence and that a further remedy judgment would be issued in due course. The judgment also noted that a hearing might not be required, but if one were needed a notice would be issued.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The liability judgment found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. The amount payable was not determined in this judgment and was to be assessed on written evidence in a later remedy judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found that the respondent breached the claimant's contract by failing to pay expenses that were due. The sum payable was deferred to a later remedy judgment on written evidence. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.