Case 1601998/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Wilton-King v Cardiff and Vale College — 2020
- Case reference
- 1601998/2019
- Decision date
- 12 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moore
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Wilton-King
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 11 February 2020, Employment Judge Moore recorded a judgment under rule 52 dismissing the proceedings because the claimant had withdrawn the claim. The extracted judgment contains no findings on the merits of the dispute and records no remedy or monetary award.
The only substantive procedural outcome stated is that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal by Mr C Wilton-King. The judgment was sent to the parties on 12 February 2020.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment only records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it does not set out the underlying claim head in the extracted text. The claim type is taken from the case listing context. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment only records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it does not set out the underlying claim head in the extracted text. The claim type is taken from the case listing context. | Withdrawn | Religion or belief | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.