Case 1602009/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Webb v DWR Cymru Welsh Water — 2021
- Case reference
- 1602009/2020
- Decision date
- 4 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A.M.S. Green
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Webb
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing on disability status before Employment Judge A.M.S. Green. The respondent had conceded that the claimant was disabled from 22 February 2021 onwards, but disputed that he satisfied section 6 Equality Act 2010 at earlier material dates. The tribunal therefore considered whether, as at 31 July 2020 and from 29 October 2020 to 22 February 2021, the claimant had stress, depression and anxiety with a substantial adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities and whether the effect was long-term or likely to recur.
The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence about concentration and confidence difficulties. It relied on GP records from February to August 2020 showing stress at work, antidepressant treatment, a diagnosis of depression, referral to mental health services, weight loss, poor sleep and anxiety. It also accepted evidence about the bike accident on 16 July 2020, the driving near-misses on 2 and 28 August 2020, and difficulties with socialising, shopping, going out and personal hygiene. The tribunal also had regard to the occupational health reports in May 2020 and on 5 October 2020, which recorded depression and anxiety and addressed the likely duration of the condition.
Applying the statutory definition and the Schedule 1 long-term effect provisions, the tribunal found that the claimant was suffering from stress, depression and anxiety at the relevant dates and that these conditions had a substantial adverse effect on his day-to-day life. It held that, disregarding medication, the impairment could well continue for 12 months or recur. The tribunal accepted that this was more than a reaction to workplace unhappiness and that the medical and factual evidence showed an impairment affecting normal day-to-day activities. It therefore declared the claimant disabled for the purposes of section 6(1) Equality Act 2010 at the dates identified above. No monetary remedy was determined in this preliminary judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary disability issue only; the tribunal declared the claimant disabled for the purposes of section 6 Equality Act 2010 as at 31 July 2020, 29 October 2020, and for the period from 29 October 2020 to 22 February 2021. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.6(1) Equality Act 2010
- s.212(1) Equality Act 2010
- para 2(1) Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010
- para 5(1) Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010
- Boyle v SCA Packaging ('could well happen')
- Cruickshank v VAW Motorcast Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.