Case 1602017/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E McMahon v REXD Corporation Limited t/as Caremark (West Cheshire and Chester) — 2022
- Case reference
- 1602017/2021
- Decision date
- 25 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Hunt Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E McMahon
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs E McMahon brought claims against REXD Corporation Limited t/as Caremark (West Cheshire and Chester) for constructive unfair dismissal and unlawful deductions from wages. The case was heard by Employment Judge K Hunt at Cardiff by Cloud Video Platform on 18 and 19 July 2022. The tribunal gave its reasons orally at the hearing.
The tribunal held that the claimant's claim for constructive unfair dismissal was not well founded and that she had not been constructively unfairly dismissed by the respondent. It also held that the claim for unlawful deductions of wages was not well founded and that the respondent had not made an unlawful deduction from wages. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal described this as a claim for constructive unfair dismissal and held that it was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that no unlawful deduction from wages had been made. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.