Case 1602018/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss B Stevenson v REXD Corporation Limited T/A Caremark (Cheshire West & Chester) — 2022
- Case reference
- 1602018/2021
- Decision date
- 19 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge W Brady Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss B Stevenson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought four wages-related complaints against the respondent. The tribunal held that the deduction made on 24 September 2021 in respect of an overpayment of £1,495 gross was lawful under section 14 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, so that claim was not well founded.
The tribunal also found that £293 gross holiday pay and £94.50 gross for a night shift were properly payable. The respondent was ordered to pay those sums to the claimant.
The claimant's further complaint about a deduction in respect of the pool car was presented out of time and was dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written record does not contain any fuller explanation beyond the ruling on each issue.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant's complaint about the deduction on 24 September 2021 for an overpayment of £1,495 gross was held not well founded; the tribunal found the deduction lawful under section 14 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that £293 gross holiday pay was properly payable and ordered the respondent to pay that sum. | Upheld | — | £293 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that £94.50 gross was properly payable in respect of the night shift and ordered the respondent to pay that sum. | Upheld | — | £95 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant's complaint about a deduction in respect of the pool car was submitted out of time and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £388
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 14 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.