Case 1602025/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Lidbury v Many Tears Animal Rescue — 2021
- Case reference
- 1602025/2020
- Decision date
- 27 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Lidbury
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Miss C Lidbury's claim against Many Tears Animal Rescue. The reasons recorded were that the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 17 May 2021 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
By letter dated 20 July 2021, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not make any representations and did not request a hearing.
Because no response was received, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the underlying merits of the case or any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim after the claimant did not comply with the order dated 17 May 2021 and did not actively pursue the case. A letter dated 20 July 2021 gave her an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing, but she did neither. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.