Case 1602033/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Casserly v XPO Supply Chain UK Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1602033/2020
- Decision date
- 14 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Casserly
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard Mr D Casserly's application on 2 December 2021 before Employment Judge R F Powell at CVP. The written record states that the claimant's further and better particulars of claim, presented on 29 June 2021, were allowed to form part of his claim except for paragraph 24 and the assertion of a protected public interest disclosure under section 43B(1)(f).
The tribunal refused the application to amend the claim so as to include paragraph 24 and the protected public interest disclosure allegation. The record is limited to the operative decision; it does not set out substantive reasons on the merits, any liability findings, or any remedy award. It also notes that the reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons were requested.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The tribunal refused the application to amend the claim to include paragraph 24 and an assertion of a protected public interest disclosure under section 43B(1)(f). The remaining further and better particulars of claim were allowed to form part of the claim. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.