Case 1602038/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Chris Smith v Marr Corporation Limited t/a T2 Group — 2021
- Case reference
- 1602038/2020
- Decision date
- 18 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Webb Representation
- Venue
- By video
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Chris Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr Chris Smith, was employed by Marr Corporation Limited t/a T2 Group from 25 June 2018 to 12 May 2020. The hearing concerned a preliminary issue on disability under section 6 of the Equality Act 2010; the claim form had also referred to automatic unfair dismissal and a failure to comply with the duty to make reasonable adjustments with regard to workload and hours of work, but those substantive claims were not decided in this judgment.
The tribunal accepted that Mr Smith began suffering from anxiety in June 2019, with panic attacks, difficulty concentrating and sleeping, sickness, tearfulness, and problems being in large groups. It found that those symptoms affected normal day-to-day activities such as concentration, sleep and attendance at places with crowds, including hospitals, and that he had been self-treating with neurolinguistic programming techniques from June 2019 until he later sought medical help.
The tribunal accepted that by February 2020 Mr Smith had decided his condition had reached a point where he needed outside help. It recorded that he was given a fit note on 13 February 2020 for acute stress reaction with symptoms of anxiety, prescribed medication, and then given further fit notes through to 2 April 2020 for mixed anxiety and depressive disorder. On return to work on 3 April 2020 he continued to take medication, and the respondent agreed to monitor his hours.
Applying section 6 Equality Act 2010, Schedule 1 paragraph 2(1), Schedule 1 paragraph 5(1), and the 2011 Statutory Guidance, the tribunal concluded that the impairment had a substantial adverse effect and that, although it had not yet lasted 12 months at the relevant date, it was likely to last at least 12 months. It therefore found that Mr Smith was disabled at the time of the events in question.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only: the tribunal found that the claimant was disabled within section 6 Equality Act 2010 at the material time. The substantive unfair dismissal and reasonable adjustment claims were not determined in this judgment. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 paragraph 2(1) Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 paragraph 5(1) Equality Act 2010
- 2011 Statutory Guidance on matters to be taken into account in determining questions relating to the definition of disability
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.