Case 1602102/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P O'Dea v Triumph Furniture Limited (In Administration) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1602102/2019
- Decision date
- 6 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P O'Dea
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge S Jenkins found that Triumph Furniture Limited (in administration) had failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The judgment records that the Respondent did not comply with the statutory requirements and that the Claimant, Mr P O'Dea, was therefore entitled to a protective award.
The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay a protective award of £4,116.60 in respect of a protected period of 90 days. No other remedies, findings, or separate heads of loss are recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award ordered for the Respondent's failure to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992; protected period stated as 90 days. | Upheld | — | £4,117 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,117
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.