Case 1602107/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Williams v Mr A Lowther trading as Fire-Ex — 2022
- Case reference
- 1602107/2020
- Decision date
- 16 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Butcher Appearances
- Venue
- In Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mr A Lowther trading as Fire-Ex made unauthorised deductions from Mr D Williams’s wages by failing to pay the full amount due for the period 25 March 2020 to 11 September 2020. It recorded that the claimant was an employee within s.230(1) Employment Rights Act 1996 and therefore entitled to bring the claim, and that the statutory issue was whether any deduction was authorised by statute, contract, or prior written agreement.
The tribunal accepted that the claimant stopped working on 24 March 2020 when the national lockdown began, and that both parties understood he would be placed on the furlough scheme. The respondent said he had difficulty enrolling on the scheme and was unable to pay the claimant until receiving furlough funds; the tribunal found, however, that the respondent was contractually obliged to pay the wages and was not entitled to withhold payment pending receipt of scheme funds.
The tribunal also found that the respondent’s later suggestion of retrospective redundancy and a £375 redundancy payment was not accepted and did not amount to an agreement varying the contract or to prior written consent not to pay wages. It found that the claimant remained an employee until 11 September 2020 and had not agreed in writing to forego pay. Judgment was therefore entered for the claimant in the gross sum of £7,013.35. The reasons contain apparent date inconsistencies in places, but the operative judgment and award are for the unpaid wages claim described above.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states the unpaid period as 25/3/20 to 11/9/20 and awards £7,013.35. The reasons also contain apparent date inconsistencies, referring in places to 25/3/21 and 11/9/21. | Upheld | — | £7,013 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,013
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.13(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.230(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.