Case 1602121/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Smith v Dance Attack Collection Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1602121/2023
- Decision date
- 13 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Miss L Smith's complaint of unfair dismissal. It said that by a letter dated 27 November 2023 she had been given an opportunity to confirm the basis of the claim because she had less than the required two years' continuous service.
Miss L Smith did not provide that confirmation. The tribunal therefore concluded that the unfair dismissal complaint had no reasonable prospect of success and struck it out.
The judgment records that the claimant's remaining claims were still listed for hearing on 11 and 12 January 2024. No remedy was awarded on the struck-out unfair dismissal complaint.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | By a letter dated 27 November 2023, the claimant was given an opportunity to confirm the basis of her unfair dismissal claim because she had less than the required two years' continuous service. She did not provide that confirmation, and the tribunal struck out the complaint as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.