Case 1602125/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Row v Egan Waste Services Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1602125/2019
- Decision date
- 21 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Row
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe only claim identified in the judgment was unfair dismissal. After a preliminary hearing on 17 January 2020, the tribunal ordered the claimant to pay a deposit of £100.00. The corrected order was sent to the claimant on 6 July 2020.
The claimant did not pay the deposit. The tribunal therefore struck out the unfair dismissal complaint under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment does not contain any merits findings on the dismissal claim and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal ordered the claimant to pay a deposit of £100.00 after a preliminary hearing on 17 January 2020. The corrected order was sent on 6 July 2020, but the claimant did not pay the deposit, so the unfair dismissal complaint was struck out under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.