Case 1602126/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Ash v Gas Safe Europe Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1602126/2018
- Decision date
- 16 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Powell Dated
- Venue
- Llandudno &
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Ash
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr I Ash brought claims against Gas Safe Europe Limited for breach of contract concerning contractual notice, contractual holiday pay, and unpaid travel expenses. The case was heard at Llandudno and by video link on 4 February and 14 December 2020 before Employment Judge R F Powell.
The tribunal dismissed the claims for failure to pay contractual notice and for contractual holiday pay. It held that the breach of contract claim relating to unpaid travel expenses was well founded and succeeded.
The parties then notified agreed terms by email at 16.36 on 14 December 2020. By consent, the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant damages in the net sum of £577.02.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim in respect of a failure to pay contractual notice. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim in respect of contractual holiday pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim in respect of unpaid travel expenses; the parties later agreed terms and the respondent was ordered by consent to pay damages in the net sum of £577.02. | Upheld | — | £577 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £577
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.