Case 1602142/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Emma Owen v Mr Geraint Jones — 2020
- Case reference
- 1602142/2019
- Decision date
- 26 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Date
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Emma Owen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a remote hearing on the papers on 23 March 2020, Employment Judge S Jenkins Date considered the Claim Form and Response only. Miss Emma Owen succeeded in her claim for unpaid holiday, and the Tribunal ordered Mr Geraint Jones to pay £198.19 gross in respect of that claim.
The Tribunal also found that the Respondent had failed to provide the Claimant with a written statement of employment particulars. Pursuant to section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, the Tribunal ordered payment of an amount equal to two weeks' pay, assessed at £246.30. No other claims or remedies are recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid holiday succeeded; the Respondent was ordered to pay the gross sum of £198.19. | Upheld | — | £198 |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars; the Tribunal made an award under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 equal to two weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £246 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £444
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.