Case 1602164/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J. Phillips v Zelgo Limited Heard: by video — 2021
- Case reference
- 1602164/2020
- Decision date
- 8 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J. Phillips
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan found that Ms J. Phillips was unfairly dismissed by Zelgo Ltd. The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and had made unauthorised deductions from her wages.
The judgment records that the claims succeeded, but it did not determine the amount of any award at that stage. Remedy was deferred to a Remedy Hearing listed for 1 April 2021, to be conducted by video (CVP) before a judge sitting without non-legal members, with a time estimate of one hour.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Found by Rule 21 judgment; remedy to be determined at a later Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement; remedy to be determined later. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages; remedy to be determined later. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.