Case 1602165/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Cardiff Golf Club (an unincorporated association) and others — 2021
- Case reference
- 1602165/2020
- Decision date
- 23 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Evans
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 22 November 2021 before Employment Judge R Evans, the parties informed the Tribunal that they had agreed terms of settlement with the assistance of ACAS. The final hearing listed for 13 to 17 December 2021 was vacated, and the proceedings were stayed until 20 December 2021 to allow the settlement terms to be carried out.
The judgment provided that, unless the Claimant wrote to the Tribunal by 20 December 2021 saying that he wished the proceedings to continue, the claims would be dismissed upon withdrawal. It also stated that if the Respondent failed to comply with the settlement terms, and the Tribunal had no further contact from the Claimant before that date, the proceedings would be automatically struck out without any further order or application. No merits findings or remedy award were made in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The Tribunal recorded that the parties had agreed terms of settlement with the assistance of ACAS. No merits determination or separate monetary award was made in this judgment. | Settled | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The Tribunal recorded that the parties had agreed terms of settlement with the assistance of ACAS. No merits determination or separate monetary award was made in this judgment. | Settled | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal recorded that the parties had agreed terms of settlement with the assistance of ACAS. No merits determination or separate monetary award was made in this judgment. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.