Case 1602166/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Gunther v Little Teds Nursery & Academy Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1602166/2023
- Decision date
- 26 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D Gunther
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Wales Employment Tribunals on 15 September 2023. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge S Jenkins determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On that basis, the tribunal found that Little Teds Nursery & Academy Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered it to pay £2,330.06 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday pay entitlement and ordered payment of £345.00 gross.
The tribunal's bottom-line award was £2,675.06 gross. The judgment states that the claimant is responsible for any tax and employee national insurance due.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £2,330.06 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,330 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday pay entitlement and ordered payment of £345.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £345 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,675
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.