Case 1602167/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N K Edwards v Little Teds Nursery & Academy Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1602167/2023
- Decision date
- 26 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms N K Edwards
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Wales Employment Tribunals on 15 September 2023. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge made a determination under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that Little Teds Nursery & Academy Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from Ms N K Edwards's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £2,093.28 gross in respect of the deductions.
The tribunal also ordered the respondent to pay £40.00 as compensation for financial loss attributable to the unauthorised deduction. The total ordered to be paid to the claimant was £2,133.28 gross. The claimant was noted to be responsible for any tax and employee national insurance due.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Default judgment under rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £2,093.28 gross plus £40.00 compensation for financial loss. | Upheld | — | £2,133 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,133
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £40
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.