Case 1602173/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Chiromo v DTCC Europe Ltd and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 1602173/2023
- Decision date
- 9 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr O Chiromo
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge T. Vincent Ryan, sitting at Mold by CVP on 8 December 2023, recorded that the claimant's claims against Giant Professional Ltd in this Wales case were dismissed upon withdrawal because they were duplicated claims made in error. The judgment states that the claimant wished to continue pursuing the same allegations in other proceedings in the London Central Employment Tribunal and in the County Court.
No facts or issues were found or determined by this Tribunal in respect of Giant Professional Ltd, and the dismissal was without prejudice to the claimant's other proceedings. The judgment also records that the dismissal of the Giant Professional Ltd claims did not affect the separate race discrimination claim the claimant was pursuing against DTCC Europe Ltd in case 1602173/23.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal dismissed the claims against Giant Professional Ltd upon withdrawal, recording that they were duplicated claims made in error. The judgment does not identify the legal category of those claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.