Case 1602176/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms H Teague v Dragon Training and Recruitment Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1602176/2019
- Decision date
- 23 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jenkins Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms H Teague
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Jenkins recorded that Dragon Training and Recruitment Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Ms H Teague's wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £4,038.44 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £461.52. The hearing listed for 26 March 2020 was cancelled. No separate findings, legal tests, or additional remedy components were recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,038 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £462 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,500
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.