Case 1602177/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Knott v Boyes Rees Architects Limited (In Administration) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1602177/2019
- Decision date
- 30 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brace
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Knott
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a consent judgment in which the Tribunal declared that the Respondent, Boyes Rees Architects Limited (in administration), had failed to comply with the requirement in section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The claim was therefore well founded.
The Tribunal made a protective award in respect of the claimant, Mr M Knott, for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 23 August 2019. The judgment records that the respondent was ordered to pay remuneration for that protected period in the sum of £13,752.05.
The judgment does not set out any further findings of dispute or a separate breakdown of award components beyond the protective award sum. It is recorded as sent to the parties on 30 June 2020 and signed by Employment Judge Brace.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | By consent judgment, the Tribunal declared that the Respondent failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and made a protective award covering the claimant's protected period. | Upheld | — | £13,752 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,752
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.188 TULRCA 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.