Case 1602178/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. A. Williams v PRL Realisations 1 Ltd (in administration) HELD in: Wrexham — 2021
- Case reference
- 1602178/2019
- Decision date
- 1 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. A. Williams
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Wrexham before Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan, upheld Mr A. Williams' claim for unauthorised deductions from wages against PRL Realisations 1 Ltd (in administration). The decision records that the respondent made unauthorised deductions in the period 22 June 2019 to 1 August 2019.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £2,307.82 in wages, subject to the usual statutory deductions. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within the applicable time limit.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages for the period 22 June 2019 to 1 August 2019 and ordered payment of £2,307.82, subject to usual statutory deductions. | Upheld | — | £2,308 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,308
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £2,308
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.