Case 1602179/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Bell v Review For You Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1602179/2019
- Decision date
- 15 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Beard Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Bell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Beard decided the case on 15 September 2020 under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 because the respondent had not presented an ET3 response form. The judgment states that there was sufficient material before the tribunal to make a proper determination.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for unpaid wages and awarded £500 gross. The judgment also records that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on sums awarded in respect of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that, in the absence of an ET3 response form and on the material before the tribunal, the claim for unpaid wages was upheld in the gross sum of £500. | Upheld | — | £500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £500
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.