Case 1602185/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L. Acteson & others v GI Group Recruitment Ltd and 3 others — 2021
- Case reference
- 1602185/2020
- Decision date
- 17 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
5 namedClaimant
Mr L. Acteson & others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a telephone case management preliminary hearing on 16 March 2021, Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan recorded that all claims alleging unauthorised deductions from wages were withdrawn and dismissed. The judgment also recorded that the claims of Mrs K. Bowen, Mr W. Borja, Mr G. Davies, Mr W. Dawkins, Mr L. Dowling, Mr R. Edwards, Mr R. Watts and Mr N. Williams were withdrawn and dismissed in their entirety.
Ms H. Doyle withdrew her unfair dismissal claim and her automatic unfair dismissal claim, and those claims were dismissed. The tribunal noted that this did not affect her other claims, which were to proceed to a further preliminary hearing.
The decision was made orally at the hearing and the written record states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No monetary award was made in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | All claims alleging unauthorised deductions from wages were withdrawn and dismissed at a case management preliminary hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Ms H. Doyle withdrew her unfair dismissal and automatic unfair dismissal claims; the tribunal dismissed those claims and recorded that her other claims would proceed to a further preliminary hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.