Case 1602209/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Gwynne v [1] Mr J Durran [2] White Lion (Chepstow) Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1602209/2019
- Decision date
- 8 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge W Beard Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Gwynne
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this judgment on withdrawal under rule 52, Employment Judge W Beard recorded that the claimant’s complaints of unfair dismissal, breach of contract and unpaid wages were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. The order was dated 8 April 2020 and sent to the parties on the same date.
The judgment also states that the claimant’s remaining claim would proceed to hearing, with the date to be notified in due course. No substantive findings on liability or remedy were made in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant under rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant under rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to this as 'Unpaid Wages' and dismisses it following a withdrawal by the claimant under rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.