Case 1602213/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Knight v South Wales Car and Van Service Centre Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1602213/2019
- Decision date
- 19 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Knight
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mr P Knight against South Wales Car and Van Service Centre Ltd. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £735.43.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. Damages of £538.90 were awarded under that head. In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £480.00.
The hearing listed for 25 February 2020 was cancelled. No discrimination, unfair dismissal, or other statutory claims are recorded in the judgment text, and no separate findings beyond the three monetary awards are given.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £735 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awards damages of £538.90. | Upheld | — | £539 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awards £480.00. | Upheld | — | £480 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,754
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.