Case 1602231/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Green v Heronston Investments Ltd t/a Heronston Hotel — 2023
- Case reference
- 1602231/2023
- Decision date
- 19 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moore Representation
- Venue
- By video
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Green
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the video hearing on 15 December 2023 before Employment Judge S Moore, the tribunal upheld Mr P Green's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages against Heronston Investments Ltd t/a Heronston Hotel. It found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction of £10.00 from wages and also ordered £2.36 to compensate the claimant for financial loss attributable to that deduction.
The tribunal dismissed the breach of contract complaint in relation to notice pay. It held that that claim was not well-founded. It also upheld the separate holiday pay complaint, finding that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant for holidays accrued but not taken on the date his employment ended. The respondent was ordered to pay £415.40 net in respect of that holiday pay claim.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the £10.00 deducted sum plus £2.36 for financial loss attributable to the deduction. | Upheld | — | £12 |
| Breach of contract | The complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant had not been paid for holidays accrued but untaken when his employment ended and ordered payment of £415.40 net. | Upheld | — | £415 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £428
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.