Case 1602250/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Palmer v Midas Display Systems Ltd and 2 others — 2020
- Case reference
- 1602250/2019
- Decision date
- 17 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moore Date
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Ms K Palmer
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Cardiff on 16 March 2020 before Employment Judge Moore, and in the absence of the respondents, the tribunal recorded that Ms K Palmer’s claim for wrongful dismissal succeeded, together with her claims for unpaid holiday pay and unpaid wages. The judgment states that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £833.33 for wrongful dismissal, £144.24 for unpaid holiday pay, and £19.20 for unpaid wages. It also ordered costs of £67.06. The total sum ordered was £1,063.83.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant’s claim for wrongful dismissal succeeds and orders payment of £833.33. | Upheld | — | £833 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the claimant’s claim for unpaid holiday pay succeeds and orders payment of £144.24. | Upheld | — | £144 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant’s claim for unpaid wages succeeds and orders payment of £19.20. | Upheld | — | £19 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,064
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.