Case 1602262/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Gowen v Jamie Edwards and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 1602262/2020
- Decision date
- 2 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ward JUDGMENT
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr M Gowen
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Ward heard the case in Cardiff on 31 January 2022. The tribunal found that the claimant, Mr M Gowen, suffered unauthorised deductions from wages on 20 August, 20 September and 20 October 2020.
The judgment records that the second respondent, AJ Edwards (Property Services) Ltd (in voluntary liquidation), failed to pay wages properly payable to the claimant. The tribunal therefore ordered that respondent to pay £3,542.16 gross for outstanding wages.
The written record states that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that no written reasons were provided. No separate award components beyond the outstanding wages sum are recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages on 20 August, 20 September and 20 October 2020. It ordered the second respondent, AJ Edwards (Property Services) Ltd (in voluntary liquidation), to pay £3,542.16 gross for outstanding wages. | Upheld | — | £3,542 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,542
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.