Case 1602283/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Chick v Applied Power Services (South Western) Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1602283/2020
- Decision date
- 12 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Harfield Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Chick
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Cardiff on 7 and 8 April 2022, before Employment Judge R Harfield, the tribunal recorded that the claimant’s holiday pay claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. The tribunal also found that Mr M Chick was constructively unfairly dismissed and constructively wrongfully dismissed by Applied Power Services (South Western) Limited.
The tribunal awarded £1,139.07 as a basic award and £767.18 as a compensatory award for unfair dismissal, and £2,531.25 for wrongful dismissal. The total monetary award was £4,437.50.
A recoupment order was made under the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996. The prescribed element was £617.18, based on loss of earnings of £2,057.25 less 70% contributory conduct, for the period 5 October 2010 to 8 April 2022. The amount by which the monetary award exceeded the prescribed element was £3,820.32. The judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons were not provided.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the holiday pay claim is dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Found to be constructively unfairly dismissed. Award comprised a basic award of £1,139.07 and a compensatory award of £767.18. | Upheld | — | £1,906 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Found to be constructively wrongfully dismissed. | Upheld | — | £2,531 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,438
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,139
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £767
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.