Case 1602290/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A. Pryce v Mr. C. Carter and 2 others — 2021
- Case reference
- 1602290/2020
- Decision date
- 12 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Ms A. Pryce
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan on 10 May 2021. The tribunal granted the claimant's contested application to add DHL Services Ltd as a respondent. The judgment states that DHL Services Ltd was added as a respondent to the claims and would be the sole respondent in consequence of the decision below.
The tribunal also dismissed Mr C. Carter and Ms J. O'Sullivan as respondents. Their contested application succeeded because the claimant had not entered early conciliation with them before presenting her claim. The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days, and no such request had been made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | At the preliminary hearing the tribunal dismissed the claimant's claims against Mr C. Carter and Ms J. O'Sullivan because the claimant had not entered early conciliation with them before presenting the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.