Case 1602291/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Sarah Henry v Ms Theresa Manners — 2020
- Case reference
- 1602291/2019
- Decision date
- 29 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Sarah Henry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 default judgment in the Employment Tribunal. The judgment records that the Respondent unfairly dismissed the Claimant, Mrs Sarah Henry, and awards her a basic award of £366.75.
The tribunal also found that the Claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. For that claim, it ordered the Respondent to pay damages of £353.16 gross.
In addition, the tribunal found that the Respondent had failed to pay the Claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £220.05 gross. The hearing listed for 29 June 2020 was cancelled. The total of the sums awarded is £939.96.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the Respondent unfairly dismissed the Claimant and awards a basic award of £366.75. | Upheld | — | £367 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the Claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awards damages of £353.16 gross. | Upheld | — | £353 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the Respondent failed to pay the Claimant’s holiday entitlement and awards £220.05 gross. | Upheld | — | £220 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £940
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £367
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.