Case 1602304/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D A Jenkins v Dragon Training and Recruitment Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1602304/2019
- Decision date
- 23 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jenkins Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D A Jenkins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Jenkins recorded that Dragon Training And Recruitment Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr D A Jenkins's wages. The judgment did not record any live hearing findings beyond the tribunal's determination on the papers.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £4,089.48. It also recorded that the hearing listed for 26 March 2020 was cancelled. No discrimination, dismissal, or other separate claim was identified in the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum stated. | Upheld | — | £4,089 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,089
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.