Case 1602340/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Mitchell v Wilko Retail Limited c/o Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP — 2025
- Case reference
- 1602340/2023
- Decision date
- 10 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harfield
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Mitchell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 13 January 2025, the Tribunal gave Mr I Mitchell an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The judgment states that the claimant failed to make representations in writing, failed to make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying dispute or any monetary remedy, and it was approved by Employment Judge Harfield on 2 February 2025 and sent to the parties on 10 February 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. A letter dated 13 January 2025 gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing, but the claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.