Case 1602341/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Jago v Deli a Go Go Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1602341/2020
- Decision date
- 8 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moore
- Venue
- Remotely
- Panel members
- Mrs M Humphries, Mrs M Walters
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Jago
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the remote hearing on 4 and 5 November 2021 before Employment Judge S Moore, Mrs M Humphries and Mrs M Walters, the tribunal upheld Miss Jago's unfair dismissal claim. It ordered a basic award of £161.54, a compensatory award of £516.93, and £300.00 for loss of statutory rights, making £978.47 on that claim. The tribunal also upheld the claim for unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered £231.00.
The tribunal dismissed the claim under section 18 Equality Act 2010 and the claim under section 47(3) Employment Rights Act 1996 because both were presented outside the relevant time limits. It also made an award of £646.16 under section 38(3) Employment Act 2002. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Awarded a basic award of £161.54, a compensatory award of £516.93, and £300.00 for loss of statutory rights. | Upheld | — | £978 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of £231.00. | Upheld | — | £231 |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Section 18 Equality Act 2010 claim dismissed because it was presented outside the relevant time limits. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Other | Section 47(3) Employment Rights Act 1996 claim dismissed because it was presented outside the relevant time limits. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,856
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £162
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £517
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.