Case 1602357/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Derek Max Griese (as Personal Representative of Marie Louise Griese v BJP Residential Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1602357/2020
- Decision date
- 2 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bromige Representation
- Venue
- Wales ET
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Derek Max Griese (as Personal Representative of Marie Louise Griese
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim upon withdrawal. It also rejected the holiday pay claim under the Working Time Regulations 1998, finding that claim not well founded.
The tribunal upheld the claim for unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered the respondent to pay £12,145.50 in respect of that claim. The judgment also records that the total amount of the award was £12,145.00 and that the recoupment provisions do not apply.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The holiday pay claim under the Working Time Regulations 1998 was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £12,145.50 in respect of unauthorised deduction from wages; the judgment also states that the total amount of the award was £12,145.00. | Upheld | — | £12,146 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,145
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.