Case 1602358/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Davies First v Elite Fitness limited (in creditors voluntary liquidation) Second Respondent: Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (referred to as the Insolvency Service in the proceedings) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1602358/2019
- Decision date
- 16 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cookson Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr D Davies was a worker within the meaning of s230(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. On that basis, it accepted that the first respondent was liable to pay him for hours worked in September 2019, and it held that the failure to do so amounted to an unlawful deduction from wages contrary to s13 ERA 1996. The sum payable on that head was £300.
The tribunal also found a series of unlawful deductions from wages in relation to annual leave. It held that the first respondent had failed to pay for annual leave, contrary to regulation 14 and regulation 16 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and s13 Employment Rights Act 1996. The amount identified for that claim was £607.71, which was ordered to be paid to the claimant.
The claim against the second respondent was dismissed on withdrawal. No separate remedy was recorded for that respondent. The judgment records no award of interest or other additional compensation, and the total sum payable on the substantive claims was £907.71.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the first respondent made an unlawful deduction from wages by failing to pay the claimant for hours worked in September 2019. | Upheld | — | £300 |
| Working time regulations | The tribunal found a series of unlawful deductions totalling £607.71 in respect of annual leave pay under regulation 14 and regulation 16 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and s13 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £608 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £908
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- s230(3) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulation 16 Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.