Case 1602360/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Evason v Abrasive Technology Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1602360/2019
- Decision date
- 12 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moore
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Evason
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 52 withdrawal judgment. Employment Judge S Moore recorded that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant, Mr T Evason, against Abrasive Technology Ltd.
The judgment contains no findings on liability or the merits of the underlying dispute. It does not set out any factual findings, legal analysis, or remedy calculation, and it does not record any award or apportionment between heads of claim.
The decision therefore reflects procedural disposal only: the case ended because the claimant withdrew his claim, and the tribunal dismissed the proceedings on that basis.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states only that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No merits findings or separate award were recorded. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states only that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No merits findings or separate award were recorded. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.