Case 1602369/2020 · Employment Tribunal
A Parry v Sunnysands Caravan Park Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1602369/2020
- Decision date
- 3 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Harfield Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
A Parry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld A Parry’s complaint of unfair dismissal by reason of making a protected disclosure against Sunnysands Caravan Park Ltd. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons are provided unless requested in accordance with the Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal awarded a compensatory award of £4,785.20. This was made up of £4,285.20 net loss of earnings and pension contributions and £500 for loss of statutory rights. The written judgment records that the recoupment regulations apply.
The monetary award was broken down further for recoupment purposes: the prescribed element was £3,835.20, covering a period of 12 weeks commencing on 2 July 2020, and the amount by which the monetary award exceeded the prescribed element was £950.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal upheld the complaint of unfair dismissal by reason of making a protected disclosure. The monetary award was stated to be £4,785.20, made up of £4,285.20 net loss of earnings and pension contributions plus £500 for loss of statutory rights. | Upheld | — | £4,785 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,785
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £4,785
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.