Case 1602373/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Geraint Wyn Jones v Seiont Manor Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1602373/2019
- Decision date
- 7 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brace Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Geraint Wyn Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was made in the absence of an ET3 response form from Seiont Manor Limited. Employment Judge Brace recorded that there was sufficient material before the tribunal to make a proper determination and acted under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal's Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal upheld Mr Geraint Wyn Jones's claims for unpaid wages and notice pay. It awarded £525.00 for unpaid wages, stated as a gross sum, and £484.60 for notice pay, stated as a net sum.
The total award recorded in the judgment was £1,009.60. The judgment stated that the claimant was responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions that may be due on sums awarded in respect of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay, although no separate holiday pay award was listed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment describes this claim as unpaid wages (gross). | Upheld | — | £525 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Judgment describes this claim as notice pay (net). | Upheld | — | £485 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,010
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal's Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.