Case 1602375/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Gabor Veso v Seiont Manor Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1602375/2019
- Decision date
- 29 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brace Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Gabor Veso
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Brace gave judgment on 29 October 2020 in the absence of an ET3 response form from Seiont Manor Limited. The judge recorded that there was sufficient material to make a proper determination and acted under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal's Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal upheld Mr Gabor Veso's claims for unpaid wages, holiday pay and notice pay. It awarded £1,400.00 gross for unpaid wages, £996.00 gross for holiday pay, and £843.43 net for notice pay, making a total award of £3,239.43.
The judgment stated that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on the sums awarded for unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records this as unpaid wages gross. | Upheld | — | £1,400 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment records this as holiday pay gross. | Upheld | — | £996 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records this as notice pay net; it does not otherwise label the legal cause of action. | Upheld | — | £843 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,239
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal's Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.